Control of Thoughts and Beyond
Since the
beginning of recorded history in India, there has been a considerable
discussion on the perception of reality
- what this term means, how does it get manifested and how to respond to
it. I am quite sure, other cultures across the world may have also contemplated
their views on this topic. We need not go that
far to understand the crux of the issue that is being discussed.
We need to only
consider our own thoughts that arise in our minds every second of our life. We
need to observe and see what effect those thoughts have on us and why and how do we seem to get affected? We need to observe how thoughts seem to change with the
passage of time, with the changes in our body, mind and the circumstances
around us. We need to ask ourselves the following question: do we generate
thoughts or are they generated by circumstances? There seems to be a ‘visual’
objective reality out there – in
front of our eyes. However, what goes on in our minds by encountering this
objective visual reality – is what defines our experience (or notion or
perception) of that reality. Thus, for any given visual objective external
reality, there are billions of notions regarding the same, formed by people who
are a part of that reality. Thus, who is to say what is right or wrong? The
entire idea itself is so relative, that myths, superstitions, rationality,
logic, feelings, emotions – all these have a valid purpose in their own way and
all these inform our notions of reality. Modern times make us believe that
‘rationality’ is the ONLY reality that should be considered valid by all. I
think that is a very feeble statement to consider. The important question to
consider is : what is the definition of ‘appropriateness’?
Having
articulated the scope of perception above, we should look closely at the nature
of perception that we create for ourselves. What does this consists of?
The main
ingredient is the perception of ‘survival’ (being bounded by demands of the
body, mind and time). With this come a billion series of thoughts and most of
them involve following notions:
- Attachment: Preferences, prejudices, fears, insecurities, wordly love and affection of place + people + time. In fact, I may say that ‘thought’ itself is a reflection of staying attached to the notion of ‘individual’ bodily existence. We choose certain ideas, certain people, certain events, over something else. We create memories, the idea of present and a notion of future based on our tendencies to be attached to certain ideas, events, people and so on. What we choose to be attached with, creates a given nature of thoughts (and thereby forming a habit and leading to some actions). Attachment is something that is linked with our survival as a living entity. The need to be attached to something will persist as long as we live or conversely, as long as we are attached to something, we exercise our need to live! Scary of course, since it presents a possibility that the moment the notion of attachment goes away, we may not feel the need to live! The process of aging and gaining ‘wisdom’ is actually the process of increasing our level of being non attached to circumstances around us – to the point that we sense that ‘we’ are not the creator of our thoughts – they just happen. In ancient terms that meant ‘enlightenment’ or attaining ‘Nirvana’. And it again is extended to the possibility of the idea of reincarnation or rebirth – as long as we feel attached to our thoughts.
- Point no. (01) means that we are the creators (or directors) of our own reality. The reality is not absolute (same for everyone) but is highly relative. It is only true for the person. Thus, who are we to judge other people for their actions and consequences? Who are we to proclaim the definitions of right or wrong? Nobody. Acceptance of this fact of life brings a lot of tolerance within us – as a human race. Each one is entitled to form his/her own definition of life, choose friends, a place, get married or stay unmarried move fast or slow or whatever he/she feels is right for him/ her. Let them do it. That also goes on to imply that people’s comments cannot be applicable for your own views and concerns about life. You may consider their opinions, but not necessarily follow them. So disagreements need not be taken personally.
- Control: It is a human tendency to achieve a good amount of control over circumstances. What one means by ‘control’ is actually control over our thoughts. There are two ways of looking at this. If one is viewing the definition of ‘control’ equivalent to pursuing a given sequence of thoughts on a lifelong basis, then that’s not possible. Thoughts are bound to change –whether one likes it or not. There is no use in trying to achieve staticness or stability of thoughts. Thoughts can’t be caged. They will come and go, they will make you experience a lot of things – good as well as terrible things. Thus, there is no point in ignoring or running away from those thoughts that seem to cause pain or turmoil – you can’t avoid any of them. Our mind records everything and you cannot cheat it. Thus, pain is inevitable. So is fear and insecurity and worry. This we need to understand. We need to be watchful when pain strikes, when we worry or what causes fear? We need to understand how are we “structuring“ our thoughts, when we feel such terrible things? By observing the structures of thoughts we tend to create (that cause negative emotions), we create the possibility of modifying the structure in a way that suits us much better. This is what is meant by changing the perception of events as deemed fit. This is no doubt a very difficult process, since it is not easy to slow our thoughts and observe what are we creating. Initially, before we realize, we may have already thought a billion things and caused a great deal of internal mental harm to us. But by practice of observing, we become aware of the dicey structures and we are able to change the course of our thoughts the moment they tend to inflict an injury. This requires practice. Despite doing this, we may still end up being disappointed, but at least the occurrences of mishaps may get reduced.
- The much more evolved part of (3) is to be non attached to any kind of thought, thereby diminishing any notion based on the idea of thought. That does not mean eliminating thought. It means to be aware of an Experience, that is universal, omnipresent and beyond thought. Having such an Experience, gives stability and control.
- Thoughts, by nature, are not stable (do not last long) and are prone to change. It means the definition of ‘absoluteness’ of thought itself is subject to debate. Thus, everything may be regarded as the truth AND false AT THE SAME TIME. This means that the idea of life is notional and absolute as well. There is no truth in whatever we do and there is truth in whatever we do! This is depressing to digest, absolutely depressing. I need not elaborate further regarding a serious level of self doubt that can penetrate in our mind, if we continue to persist in these thoughts. Ram was depressed and so was Arjun. And not just once, but a couple of times in their lives. It means that such thoughts and realization of this fact is bound to hit each one of us time and again. When that happens, it is a sure knock off. Having passed through this phase at least once in my life, I can say that such experience could not be avoided (it was inevitable) and retrospectively it is good I had it – it is a part of our evolution as human beings. It just goes on to say that there is a complete Higher Form of Order for which we have no control and we nevertheless, have to put all our faith in our actions. This is extremely volatile situation to be in. I have been in this phase for 2-3 years and it is unnerving and suicidal. But, it has to be overcome. Realization and completion of this phase makes you aware of limitations of all notions we have created as human beings. However, for our survival, we need to maintain such notions. That, is perhaps, the dance of ‘Shiva’!