Shree: feelings

 

200722: Shree: feelings

i am the basis of all motion from body to mind and to go beyond to consciousness. what i perceive is a product of mind and body (or vibrations). the inquiry is about what is mind? it is not my mind or your mind but mind. mind is a product of vibrations that results in a state of imagination, wherein we perceive "forms" that change and are interdependent on us. this is a state of existence and all existence of motion is transient or not absolute. by saying "not", it does not mean derogatory but some state of motion which is yet to become absolute and blissful and unconditional. there is a  reason why one should not complain about anything or throw up anger. because it all comes back in some other form to us since it is all One. what one says or does affects one and not only the world. so the world and myself are two sides of the same coin  - do something to the world and it affects you and start with yourself and the world is affected. so what is the point in rectifying a separate point? our bliss does not depend on anything, not even a separate point and not even on my mind or body. bliss is bliss- unconditional and unmanifested and non vibration and infinite and the One. this is called as the absolute state of existence and therefore the mind can become this state if effort from our side is taken. just as motion feels real, so is the absolute state that dissolves everything. wake up from your slumber! another way to achieve this is to think and believe in long term action that becomes unconditional. God is eternal and hence long term prospect. if one does something without any purpose, then it is becoming God.

the answer to my query of loneliness of self seems to lie with the signals i send and how i perceive others to respond. many people gravitate around themselves - perhaps for feeling safe. but herds do not think and that also deadens the mind. so the response is to go on a path all by the self. no hard feelings to anyone, but this is a consequence of a tendency inherited within the self. all is from God so i trust there is a message and a learning in this decision.

in contemporary world, one thinks by intellect - it analyses, sequences, synthesizes, develops a response, acts and continues this cycle. the nature of answer and its application is informed by this tool. we make a mistake to assume that all people should arrive at answers in this manner and also employ the same tool with same intensity so things may get resolved. rubbish. people get inspired by many things and it is our duty to understand this diversity of the mind and what it means about values and how decisions seem to be taken.

most important thing is to remain peaceful unconditionally - more important than intellect or feelings. by feelings, i mean peace is important and not emotions. of course in our day to day behaviour, emotions sometime overpower intellect and we cannot think straight. in such a scenario emotions need to subside and then the intellect kicks in and things are clear to us. this is a cycle an individual goes through. but cycles of all people do not obviously match or happen at different speeds. in this scenario for any meaningful dialog to happen, we are then saying for all to be patient and to realize a common peaceful point to go ahead. is that asking for too much? in perhaps earlier times, the cycle was collective and hence things were clear to everyone. in contemporary times, cycles are individualistic and take different paths in all different directions - so how will the vehicle move ahead?! that being said, should we still feel burdened by this reality? now this is a question to go beyond. i have no easy answers here.

Hari Om.