Justification….

It is not necessary to state your intentions always – as long as you remain true to yourself in what you think - which means that your intent and your action should be seamless. Being true to yourself is to know the inevitability of phenomenon to express itself, and your intent to engage with it.

Should one justify one’s thoughts and actions? The more one says something (however intimate or personal) the words or expressions get analyzed, debated, related or compared and perhaps judged.  Whatever is manifested gets analyzed and judged. It takes practice to NOT judge a situation and just observe the tendency of expression of the phenomenon.

Personally, for me, the learning is to purely observe things and choosing to remain silent – not because I can’t justify; but because justification is not required for self love, empathy and the intent to act out of good will. This, I keep learning from Snehal. Neither is remembrance (memory) of any kind is required to justify past actions or future projections. Memory may be used to map the transformative process, the evolutionary curve and to condense phenomena to their pure values that remain constant beyond specific time or place. The record of history is for this purpose specifically – values that connect us all, the fundamental tendencies that exist in us.

Why is justification required? It seems helpful to use this technique to remove confusion of logic or separating irrational and rational thoughts. For many people, this effort is difficult to practice and so justification gets interpreted with anxiety, stress, doubt, fear and resentment. People thus exhibit different intentions. The hold of thoughts is so strong because we do not take the time and effort to analyze and accept our tendencies; that we misinterpret and keep judging good intentions of people. Why does this happen? It is because we take things personally, that we expect things to happen our way; that we think that the world should be answerable to our expectations; that we keep expecting and controlling all possible situations….because we haven’t yet realized that thoughts come from consciousness and it is we who should control the thoughts.

As an individual, I may have acknowledged and partially developed the ability of understanding above thoughts and am still in the process of acknowledging the presence of consciousness, the nature of tendency and the resultant manifestation. Despite this, even within me, a gap gets created as thoughts arise from consciousness and compel some intent in me and as I engage myself with the external world. Consciousness cannot be expressed, spoken, heard, felt in the rules of manifestation. Further, in whatever accuracy I try to communicate an idea or intent, the external world of sounds, sight, smell, touch, taste takes it in its own way and interprets in billion ways till it reaches consciousness again. Thus, what we are doing is becoming only channels of communication for consciousness to express – like a network of wires that just transfers energy. Every single second is a transfer of energy (creation of thoughts to action and back to thoughts). Our maturity is determined on whether if you consider yourself to be a conduit or a static point. As is evident, static point has limitations, whereas a conduit has enormous potential to make transformations in itself and to those it generates networks.

A conduit also implies that the idea of a separate life form does not exist. If one gets thoroughly convinced about this idea of conduit, then all thoughts that indicate a static point (ego/ anger/ frustration/ individualism) get dissolved or transformed to something else – bliss or compassion without any external reason or external existential motive. What is reached at a psychological level, is an unconditional state of peace and empathy for all.