Shree: Peace

 

Shree: Peace

A precise description or an analysis of phenomena or even that of perception does not necessarily indicate what ought to be done for peace. Nothing needs to be “done” for peace. Peace already is there – our vibrations create a sense of temporariness. It seems great to read the concerns of anthropologists and their efforts in understanding the perceptions created or applied or practiced by pre modern world. And yet, it represents an analysis indicating that maybe some worldviews are more comprehensive than others. But what about ‘designing process’ – the act of synthesizing? 

And in synthesizing, one is not necessarily prescribing to the most ideal forms of sequencing the thoughts – a ‘form’ is not merely (or perhaps cannot be) a logical extension of a perfectly sequenced of, so called, tangible thoughts! And if anyone is ‘searching’ the form from this point of view, then what one may end up doing (or creating) is not so wonderful architecture! There is also a problem, I feel at times, regarding the usage of the word ‘ expression’ – as if one wants to ‘prove’ a certain form of expression! Or prove how an expression occurs in a particular way! 

Expression need not mean proving anything at all (which may become difficult in current times!). And from that aspect, synthesizing may also mean not necessarily to be ‘right’ (politically or socially or culturally or on a humanitarian basis or whatever one thinks), but to “feel” a sense of connection and evoke a peaceful feeling.

That is all that is required – I feel. 

Hari Om.