Mauli: Apparent differences implies Oneness

 

070223: Mauli: Apparent differences implies Oneness

differences are not absolutely 'true' - they are a matter of perception that has been induced in motion. differences exist IS itself an indication of a state of perception and a "prior" state that is called as the One. there are many signs for knowing  this reality, some of which can be mentioned as:

change and transformation. had a difference been absolute, it would not have changed and would have been "dead". that, which changes, is alive and creates a difference. that, which does not create change, is dead and notional and not true. so difference is a sign of being alive and existing.

if one decodes ALL differences, it would lead to the same conclusion - of relative truth, change, context and how one perceives the situation. so the factors that shape a particular perception remain the same, although their output in terms of feelings may differ.

since there is difference, there is dilemma and confusion and ego. this is so because a start point and end point is not absolute and keeps shifting. so there is constant engagement to remain alive or in motion - that causes struggle. again, had there been just one start point, there would not have been life, so to say. one start point universally known means one sequence of progress and one destination - so the whole phenomenon (and need) of creation would not have even existed! so the search for a start point leads to transcendence.

although situations are unique to a person of different contexts, cultures, age, gender, language and so on, we can still "understand and empathize" with all life forms  - so it is an indication that a fundamental Oneness exists deep within all life forms. it is also an indication of what seems fundamental amidst the vast apparent difference one perceives and therefore what is the nature of perception that sees and causes differences and can also melt differences?

a particular "idea" may be stated in a particular book - but everyone may be able to relate to it. this means situations or tendencies need not come in the way of understanding an idea or a concept or an inquiry. this means that ideas or inquiries can be fundamental for everyone to anchor but the expression of those ideas may be different for each individual. so individualism is a notion or a construct of existence but is not absolutely true.

since fundamental reality is understood in unique ways by each individual, it means that one method of becoming the Truth is not applicable for the other person - each has to discover the same truth through his/her tendency of perception. truth exists without confirmation or justification or even acknowledgement - it is more a matter of recognizing and realizing and becoming the truth.

all things are more than pure logic or a predictable sequence. this is because of the existence of "vibrations" or a property of consciousness. we ourselves do not know the entire depth of consciousness and how certain things interact with one another (even within our mind) to create what we call as perception. hence there is a big role of trust and the entire trust being the foundation of blissful existence. thus concept of ego, justification, approval, confirmation is entirely false.

all that we see and behave and react and fear and change is a matter of existing in a particular state of mind. if seers tell us to trust God, that also has to be learnt so that we become trusting and blissful and unconditional. how this happens is again to be trusted. situations may come, they will need to be responded and endured and yet trust need to continue.

Hari Om.