Shree: current times

 

Shree: current times

To be concerned about universal connection is intrinsic but cannot be and need not be forced, since it will feel as being conditioned and controlled - else it starts to feel getting defensive. This happens because the universal dimension as Truth is felt in different intensities and hence the suggestion is not taken in appropriate spirit. This may also happen in other ways or actions or words as well, and hence the kind of universally connected output one suggests or expects or discusses in terms of space and time may not be seen in that spirit by “all” (or by different forms). Forms become different, means they perceive existence in different ways and hence the Truth appears or seems to behave in different ways on different people.

This is called as Satwa-Raja-Tama in philosophical terms – motives that make forms appear and change and remain interdependent. By this it is also evident that the start point of a force cannot be ascertained with surety and that in no way again justifies who or what you are. I mean the definition of justification is not to be conditioned or depended on what is felt as signals of motion coming from situations or individual forms. Hence to “search” for authentic truth in a situation need not become a necessity – it should be a natural process of unfolding (again not told to anyone).

Again defensiveness of internal signals, sequences, variables that one ‘creates’ and with which one deals or connects with an external phenomenon is not necessary to ‘exist’. In fact, justification is a construct of a state of mind – it is a ‘force’ that seeks justification and through which thoughts and feelings get created and actions created. Existence, if coming from motion (or ego) will forever seek justification (or how ‘I’ is made and connected and evolved and speculated and so on). Thus the inquiry is what should be ‘felt’ or realized as the nature of Existence?

In current times, too fast a change is creating internal world of forces that phenomenally mean anxiety, stress, withdrawal symptoms, defensives, burst of weirdness, annoyance, extreme demands on privacy, micro management or micro control, plagiarism of feelings and many other feelings – summarily externally people either become too rigid or too aloof or too careless or too much suspended in a dreamy world. As this is written, it is felt why the need of micro management or control and surveillance and micro planning and too much production and rules and excess occupancy of the mind has occurred? Where is this tendency located? Understanding of this may lead to a different approach of living.

I think the issue is about ‘expression’ and NOT ‘defense’ and there seems to be a confusion and an inclination to gravitate perception to a defensive mode instead of expression mode.

Will expression stand its ground against defensiveness? This is the crux of the issue.

Hari Om.