Shree

 

Shree 

To exist means to become visible as space and become related or connected with it. Existence has spatial, temporal and experiential dimensions and which comes first is a mute point. 

If any experience of some kind (vibrations) want to become "something", it has to be made *_visible as_* space and time. 

I am also a space and time starting from vibrations, to thoughts, to feelings to the outside medium. 

Therefore to assume that space is neutral and physical is a misconception. I and space are integral in thoughts, feelings, senses, movements, changes and interactions. The sense of a grounded place can be created if the same seed of intent is within me. 

Can a diagram have all above realizations and can a diagram be seen as a method to also uncover or discover more realizations? Can realizations be spoken about? Can they help to connect? Can they help in designing? 

How do ideas in planning on site or compositions depend on _perceptions_ of space? A physical way of considering 'site' may lead to a response in designing that would be different than a symbolic spatial idea that awaits expression. How does one deal with these ideas and shouldn't they be entertained and accepted in academic institutions?

Hari Om.