श्री
श्री
Random thought patterns as we try to analyse everyday life
श्री
श्री
Shree
श्री
Shree
I
have been observing the origin of how does a tendency develop and suffice to
say that there is no fixed point to think in a particular way. Thinking and
being particular is an ability of mind to conceive and act on anything and
since it is a loop, it can create a situation. As we move around the world of
forms, we see that forms have “movements” of change, character,
interconnectedness, relations, meanings and physical movements of coming and
going. This we see it all happening when we are dwelling in this phenomenal
world. This seeing and thinking and analyzing and inferring is dependent again
on our own self and hence just as things are relative and cannot be said with
certainty what it is or what it is not – this understanding too comes from our
own state of mind (which has got to be temporary!). Again where does mind
originate and how would it function and what it creates and where and when it
goes? All is the making of the force of Existence. Nothing can be dismissed or
subletted – all remains in our mind and all comes back in some other form, some
other day and in some other situation – like a cycle of vibrations! Whatever we
may think, it creates vibrations and forms and forces of engagement and hence
no matter how truthful we may think ourselves to be, our quality of engagement
generates the corresponding feeling within us how far we have evolved. We have
definitely come from God and we just cannot fool that fact and dare not
suppress this reality. If not now whatever we face, we will face things later.
There is no such thing as escape. All is within us. So the fundamental search
for variables of fear or ego is quite useless – that would never perhaps stop
vibrations! Fear or ego is to be seen as those are and they are required to “pass”
through the mind. Let all thoughts with their connections and impacts come and
go. All comes from Beyond, so all is required to be welcomed.
Currently
thereis much too distraction and apathy of experiences getting created by
information explosion. Memory is getting affected like nothing else before! To
retain or not to retain and what to retain and how are becoming fundamental
inquiries. What to say, how, when, where and alignment are also getting
challenged internally and externally. All in all, it is an atmosphenere of
toppling. Become silent.
Hari
Om.
श्री
Shree:
fragmentation
Algorithm
is already a fragmented way of looking at reality of Existence. In fact any
such ‘form’ of perception that causes a process or a physical entity is seen
only because one gets fragmented within. त्याला पायरी पायरी ने घसरून, सूक्ष्मा पासून ते स्थुला
पर्यंत अवतरणे असे म्हणतात. Fragmentation
is a process set in consciousness that results in creation, movement,
connections, sequences, forms, from vibrations to intellect to feelings to a
body. More is the fragmentation; more is the nature of form one so perceives.
It seems because we “see forms”, it indicates the level of a fragmented
existence we perceive! The sense of individualism or privacy is also embedded
in this nature of existence – of fragmentation. This has many repercussions on
the nature of perception – fundamentally being of dependence, isolation,
stress, surveillance, control, order and so on, summarily sensed as disconnect.
What one should know from this that there happens a “change within us” that creates
more harm than good and in the process lets out those feelings or forms that
are harmful for the phenomenal world. To become an individual or private freak
is a kind of “vibration” or a “message” sent to the web of cosmos which has an
effect and comes back to you in some ways which inflicts harm again. The
problem with individualism that one engages as a language is that the message
of universal connect becomes further weakened. One fails to acknowledge the
voices having larger dimension of space and time – culture, history
phenomenology, philosophy and so on – to name a few. But even more critical is
that philosophy, which is meant to blurr the idea of self, is also seen as a “fix
it” solution to contemporary problems and herein lies the uiltimate impact of the
individual mindset! Messages encoded in great works or texts or studies or
forms of art can no longer be “read” with the required intent.
Hari
Om.
Shree
Instead of
justifying what sort of thought “appears” or gets “created”, I think it is
necessary to “feel the creation” of the thought. In this context, “feeling” is
used as a process of coming from Beyond and letting the vibrations linger and
then go away. Justification has no end and can get debated unnecessarily and
essentially the expression is always incomplete, intangibly born and coming
outside and some transformation has taken place. This has many, many unlimited
ways of coming into the phenomenal world and is eternally being done. This is
Divine Action and the mind is an instrument to give some shape to this action.
It is only an instrument, but not the primary cause. Let it be known.
Hari Om.
Shree
Who I am as a human
therefore is only an imagination or a state of Being that can mold, change, and
connect – as a destined process. There need not be any sort of expectation of
self, action, perception, space, time and any other thing. That does not mean
we are not there. We are suggesting here that our being in the phenomenal world
is NOT conditional or something expected to produce anything from personal
motives.
Things happen. This
happening comes from Beyond or by the presence of Beyond.
श्री
लोकांचं म्हणणं असतं की सुधारणा केली की "आनंद" मिळेल...पर्यायाने राग कमी होईल असे त्यांना सांगायचे असते कदाचित! सुधारणा झाली (जसे की systems नामक प्रकार) की गोष्टी हातात आयत्या मिळतील किंव्हा प्रकट होतील अशी बाळबोध समजूत असते! I think you only can change the sequence of variables or the definition of variables.
This means the manner of creation of memory through experiences of body, mind, and vibrations alters. If the incidence of using body was extreme in historical times, it leads to a perception and imagination or feeling of environment+ people in a particular way. Compare this with virtual systems of engagement where the use of intellectual logic is extreme and that of bodily presence (in real space -time) is minimum. Or, I can say that the presence (and therefore perception) of body gets altered as the idea of space-time gets changed/ reimagined! This means there exists a connection of space-time with inner and outer tendencies and their effects or feelings of environment, people, relationships and so on. So it is one interconnected medium.
एका ही घटक्यात बदल झाला की सर्व इतर घटक्यांमध्ये बदल होतो. म्हणजे ज्या पद्धतीने भावना पूर्वी यायच्या, आता त्या पद्धतीने येत नाही किंव्हा निराळ्याच भावना येऊ पाहतात! जवळच उदाहरण द्यायचं झालं तर ज्या पद्धतीने शिकवण्याचा परिणाम मुलांवर व्हायचा "पूर्वी", आता ती शिक्षण पद्धती अजिबात काम करत नाही! उलट होणारी प्रक्रिया अशी असते की शिक्षकाला भिंतीवर डोक आपटू की काय असे वाटू शकेल!
अर्थ खूप खोलवर आहे. ह्यात मनाचे कंगोरे दिसून येतात. नाती, गोती, व्यवहार, संस्कृती, नियम, आकार, हेतू.....पूर्वीच्या संकल्पनांना मुरड घालण्याची गरज आहे. आणि सहजासहजी होणार नाही ही गोष्ट, कारण मानवी स्वभाव चिवट असल्यामुळे खूप मनस्ताप भोगायला लागणार आहे.
असो, गुंतणे आपण कधी कधी उगाचच करतो. मेट्रो आली म्हणून सुविधा झाल्या. असतील. मनोवृत्ती वरवर शांत झालेल्या वाटतात. तसे पुढच्या काळात उफळणारे वृत्ती दाबून किंव्हा मारून गेलेल्या "वाटतील", पण तसे काहीही "गायब" होत नाही! नव्या आकारास त्याच चिवट वृत्ती बाहेर येऊ पाहतात आणि निमित्त मिळालं की झालं!
Generally what people mistake as "new experience" is only a sort of recalibration of the fundamental behaviour of mind! It is the same extent of mind that is under work!
In developed countries, generally public spaces appear extremely "silent, orderly, disciplined" and many more adjectives equivalent to this mentioned feeling. But I guess that's on the surface. Deeper down, we have the same fears, feelings about existence. Noone admits this, because it is strange that human expression is hardwired to resist any revelation from other or to appear vulnerable. It is a lost battle, according to me, if one doesn't acknowledge the vulnerability of a phenomenon of form! Anger actually is a kind of admittance of having no idea of what do we do here as people?!! One foolishly thinks that one is "in control of things", whereas, in reality the truth is profoundly different.
दृश्यात येण्यात खूप कष्ट असतात...स्तरातून, स्थितीतून, वृत्तीतून, मनातून, आकारास येणे! आणि एकदा आलो, की इतकं गुंतून राहणे की ती वस्तू डोक्यातून न निघणे. आणि शेवटी त्याच वस्तूत असंख्य पद्धतीने गुंतून राहणे काहीही अर्थ नसतांना ( *उगाचच*). अर्थात, हे नैसर्गिक असावं, देवाकडून आलेलं कार्य. मेट्रो ची चाव चाव किती होते! कुठलीही गोष्ट घ्या...चाव चाव असतेच! तरीही आपण काही चावा घेण्याचं सोडत नाही! बघा आता, की वृत्ती किती खोलवर गेली आहे ते!
म्हणून का होईना, नामस्मरणाचा ध्यास घ्यायला सुरुवात करायला लागते. ही देखील प्रक्रिया हळू होणारी आहे. सैय्यम खूप हवा. कृपा होईल.
हरि ओम.
श्री
Essential Texts
Search for a form
Pattern
Language
Spaces of the Soul
A lifeworld
Dwelling, Place and
Environment
श्री: शांत होणे
घाई करून चालत नाही. मन अनेक वृत्ती निर्माण करत आणि इथे + तिथे धडपड करायचा अट्टाहास धरतं. मन ही शक्ती आहे, आणि एका प्रकारच्या जाणिवेतून हा परिणाम निर्माण होतो.
तरीही घाई करून उपयोगाचं नाही, कारण ज्याचा शोध आहे, जो मोलाचा अनुभव आहे, तो दृश्याच्या परिणामांशी निगडित नाही आहे. त्यावरून शांती भावाची व्याख्या पूर्ण अवलंबून नाही. हे स्वाभाविक आहे. त्यामुळे शोध ही गरज निर्माण होते जीवाची. शोध हे अट्टाहासाने होतो का?! नैसर्गिक प्रक्रिया ही की जेव्हा होईल शांती भावाची प्रचिती तेव्हाच होईल.
स्वतः बद्दल विचार केला कि जाणवत कि आपल्या कृतीवर, हेतूवर, वृत्तीवर काहीही ठरवू नये. दृश्य दिसत, परिस्थिती येते, लोकं वागतात, ते बोलतात, ते प्रक्रिया देतात, आपण काहीतरी सांगतो, काहीतरी मांडतो, काहीतरी कार्य करतो – हे कुणावर ही (आणि स्वतःवर ही) अवलंबून मानण्याची गरज नाही. मुळात कुठल्याच अश्या निर्माण होणाऱ्या गोष्टींवर सुरुवात किव्हा शेवट बघू नये (किव्हा तसे विचार आणल्याची गरज का असावी?!). सुरुवात किव्हा शेवट मानणे आणि त्याचा ध्यास घेणे हे खूप दुखला कारण बनू शकत. बुद्धीची वागणूक अशी आहे कि ते सुरुवात शोधण्याचा प्रयत्न करेल आणि त्याच्या चक्रात आपण वावरत राहिलो तर सुटका नाही. “मूळ” शोधणे किव्हा होणे किव्हा अनुभवणे हे “सुरुवात” संकल्पना पेक्षा वेगळ आहे. मूळ होतांना आपण शांत होतो, विशाल होतो, स्थिरावतो. तसा भाव सुरुवात शोधतांना मिळत नाही.
म्हणून वृत्ती कुठे चिकटते आणि सारखी मनाला आठवण करत लावते, ते बघावे. ती वृत्ती, त्या संकल्पनेतून काढून भगवंताला अर्पण करा किव्हा वृत्तीला शांत करा. मुख्यतः वृत्ती “ मी” ह्या संकल्पनेला चिकटून राहते म्हणून जन्म, मरण, जीवन ह्याची शाश्वती मिळत नाही आणि भीती वाटते आणि काहीही केल्या ती भीती काही जात नाही. हे मान्य करणे पाहिलं. दुसरी गोष्ट कि त्या भीती बद्दल, जी इतकी सूक्ष्म आहे, ती इतरांना सांगता हि येत नाही पूर्णपणे. म्हणजे ती “निर्माण” झालेली वस्तू आहे, जिच्यात बदल, गुंतागुंती, चंचलपणा राहणार.
प्रकरण अस आहे कि वृत्ती शांत होऊ देणे. त्याचे अनेक मार्ग असावेत. त्याच्या अगोदर स्वतःला पूर्णपणे स्वीकारा दोष न देता. स्वतःला स्वीकारा यात सर्व जगाला स्वीकारा हे ओघाने आलच. म्हणजे सर्व अस्तित्वाच्या घडामोडी, स्तर, स्थिती, विचार, भावना, अर्थ, संबंध, कार्य – ह्यांना असू देणे. माझा प्रवास, अनुभव, क्रिया, संबंध – ह्या सर्व गोष्टी होत राहणार – त्यातून perfect होण्याची संकल्पना ठरत नाही/ ठरत नसते. प्रवास, अपेक्षा, नाती, संबंध, क्रिया, काम - कसल्याच गोष्टींची काळजी असू नये/ विषय मानु नये. कुठली गोष्ट कुठल्या रुपात होईल, काय घेऊन येईल, काय दाखवेल आणि काय घडेल आपल्या वावरण्यामुळे - हे सर्वस्वी भगवंताला सोपवणे आणि आपण शांत राहणे.
हरि ओम.
श्री: संस्कार
Shree: Data
Today’s nightmare
is ‘data’. But symbolically speaking extrovertedness and dependence of any kind
causes fear or a nightmare – as an imagination of the mind. Is it required to
be bothered about “data”? I feel it has lost the significance on many grounds
as a measure for discovering peace. Here are some of my understandings –
1. Rate of change is too fast to
make any sense of data in terms of variables, meaning, short and long term
measures, analysis, consolidation and revelation. A wholesome experience
requirtes allowance for change, analysis, consolidation and looking ‘beyond’.
It is applicable for life, relationships and anything of phenomenon. Too fast a
change disturbs this equation.
2. Data assimilation is reduced to a
linear logic and only some tangible and measurable expression – that too
becomes intolerant of many organic, intangible dimensions of existence. A human
being is beyond a logical dimension that is the reason we are ‘not’ machines and
have feelings and intuition. These work beyond logic and systems of
productions. This has to be ironically admitted in an age when we find it
increasingly difficult to look beyond any logical framework! By hastening the
logical thought – one ends up in that way only – more logic and perhaps more
stress and more stupidity! Look at any elder and he/she will remind oneself
that their feelings, expectations and approach to life is beyond any logical
system of analysis. Herein we are actually asking empathy for elders, which a
logical system won’t even acknowledge.
3. Life, people and situations are
ingrained with feelings too – I don’t see data acknowledging this subjective
perspective of feelings. And taking a polar stand is also not an answer to buck
this tendency. I feel what I feel and increasingly see it pointless to justify
any position – this can be either liberating or frustrating.
4. Data is equated to access, speed,
and production. Again, the intangible way unfolds a perspective that even tons
of data may not generate. Patience is a virtue that the instant culture cannot
imagine.
5. Data is based on intellect.
Awareness of Intangible presence or dimension of Existence is based on trust or
faith. Trust also informs the intellect and I only see this dimension of trust
getting compromised by increase in speed of change or of generation of data. The
ability to accept enormous complexity and contradictions is based on trust. In order
to do this, it is not necessary to understand complexity or contradictions. A fundamental
connect with anything in a tranquil state of mind is the ingredient of trust. This
should be practiced everyday.
6. Memory is rubbed off. So, the
meaning of traditions, culture, environment and how they generate a feeling of
peace require to be rediscovered and NOT to be confirmed with established
notions of those experiences. Yet decoding the process of reading and
conceiving places is essential before it is said as some rhetoric or a formula.
Essentially a peaceful place is “felt within as an experience” and is not externally
present.
7. Data assumes a fixing solution to
the problem of humanity or thoughts. This, I feel, is going against the nature
of Being – that accepting our incompleteness is a natural phenomena and then
working our way through it is a fundamental need of a human being.
8. Data assumes that things ought to
be expressed and told always and judgment or evaluation depends on that. I
don’t think that this should be the case. There are a lot of spaces that “become”
anything or take on any form.
9. Data assumes refinement,
exclusion, perfection, staticness and compartmentalization. Life or Existence
is opposite to these values.
Hari Om.
Shree: Resilience
Time of peace
unfolds. How one becomes peace is a matter of discovery and doesn’t necessarily
mean decoding or getting or fixing the relationship of space and time.
Variables, the making of the same and then establishing connections – maybe a
“tendency” of the mind, but is not a determinant to uncover peace as a feel or
character of Existence. The issue is about vibrations and the tendency, if left
unchecked, to create ‘fear’ as a way to determine all perceptions, thoughts,
actions etc. The issue is about awareness, that is expressed or gets expressed
as vibrations through thoughts and feelings and perceptions and situations and
connections and changes and responses. It is also not necessarily about
responses or sequences or appropriateness or timeliness of actions or reviewing
actions or analysis of any kind. It is not necessarily about the nature of
Existence as is perceived by the intellect.
This, then becomes,
resilience. To arrest change of any kind is the weakest way of being resilient.
Anything that allows anything to become, come and go without feeling of any
disturbance or of engagement, is resilient in response. Fundamental values,
phenomenological stance probably make us more resilient as beings – not for
anything, but only as a process of realization.
We only have
questions, not answers. I am not sure of anything and that is all ok, I feel.
Hari Om.
श्री: चौकट
मुळ शोधू नये – त्याने त्रास पदरात पडेल बुद्धीच्या तर्काने. गोष्टी अश्या का
होतात आणि कुठल्या स्वरुपात, आकारात, स्वभावात, गुण धर्म घेऊन “येतात, वारतात आणि
बदलतात” हि दैवी शक्ती आहे, त्यात जीवाच काही कर्तृत्व नाही. म्हणून
स्वतःची जाणीव दैवी स्थितीची करायला लागते. दैवी स्थितीचा हेतू आणि कार्य खूप
वेगळ्या पद्धतीने अस्तित्वात असत, जीवाच्या तुलनेने. म्हणून ती शक्ती काय आहे,
कुठला भाव घेऊन साकारलेली आहे, काय कार्य करते, इच्छा काय असावी त्या शक्तीची – हे
प्रश्न जाणीव वाढवत उत्तर मिळतात. जाणीव वाढवण्याच कार्य असं आहे कि सर्व
स्वीकारणे. पळून जाण्याची गरज नाही किव्हा चौकट असण्याची गरज नाही. कार्यात,
व्यक्तीत, वृत्तीत, स्थितीत, आपण चौकट निर्माण करतो, निर्माण करतो आणि तसे वावरतो.
चौकट होणे होत असावं. त्यातूनच संबंध, गती, येणे आणि जाणे होत राहत. म्हणजे सर्व
एकच आहे आणि बदलत राहणार आहे हे निश्चित.
हरी ओम.